Striking Similarities in Diverse Telomerase Proteins Revealed by Combining Structure Prediction and Machine Learning Approaches

Jae-Hyung Lee1,2†, Michael Hamilton5, Colin Gleeson6, Cornelia Caragea3,4, Peter Zaback1,2 , Jeffry D. Sander1,2, Xue Li1, Feihong Wu1,3,4, Michael Terribilini1,2 ,Vasant Honavar1,3,4, Drena Dobbs1,2,4


1Bioinformatics & Computational Biology Program, L.H. Baker Center for Bioinformatics & Biological Statistics, 2Dept. of Genetics, Development & Cell Biology, 3Dept. of Computer Science, 4Artificial Intelligence Research Lab. & Center for Computational Intelligence, Learning & Discovery, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50010, USA 5Dept. of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 6Dept. of Biological Sciences, Univ. of Illinois, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA


Pac Symp Biocomput. 2008;:501-512.


Abstract

Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that adds telomeric DNA repeat sequences to the ends of linear chromosomes. The enzyme plays pivotal roles in cellular senescence and aging, and because it provides a telomere maintenance mechanism for ~90% of human cancers, it is a promising target for cancer therapy. Despite its importance, a highresolution structure of the telomerase enzyme has been elusive, although a crystal structure of an N-terminal domain (TEN) of the telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit (TERT) from Tetrahymena has been reported. In this study, we used a comparative strategy, in which sequence-based machine learning approaches were integrated with computational structural modeling, to explore the potential conservation of structural and functional features of TERT in phylogenetically diverse species. We generated structural models of the N-terminal domains from human and yeast TERT using a combination of threading and homology modeling with the Tetrahymena TEN structure as a template. Comparative analysis of predicted and experimentally verified DNA and RNA binding residues, in the context of these structures, revealed significant similarities in nucleic acid binding surfaces of Tetrahymena and human TEN domains. In addition, the combined evidence from machine learning and structural modeling identified several specific amino acids that are likely to play a role in binding DNA or RNA, but for which no experimental evidence is currently available.


[Full-Text PDF] [PSB Home Page]